It is amazing to see that many people still ethink that the theory of evolution is counted as science, not even that but many eople hve been brainwashed into believing that science is nynonimous to evolution. Nothing could be forther from the truth. If you look up a dictionary, you will find that the word science means = knowledge. Where in knowledge do you see only evolution ? Nowhere, thus SCIENCE = knowledge wherever this knowledge comes from. Then SCIENCE was invented by God and all scientists have been creationists until Darwin. So saying that the name SCIENCE means evolution adn was founded by evolutionists is a lie. Creationism , story of creation. http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php  

http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php   What is creationism? Is it a new fad found in christian churches and has just started a few years ago? Why do people call it psaudo science ? Well it is because they think that creationism is brand new, but in fact creationism has been around since the garden of Eden. All scientists before Darwin were into creationism Isaac Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Mendel ect. So it is not a new thing.

http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php  TEN RACEMIC PROBLEMS—Many different factors can affect the accuracy of racemic dating methods; and, as with problems accompanying radioactive and radiocarbon dating analysis, for any given specimen no one can know which factors are involved or to what degree. Why? Because the person would have to be there studying the specimen since its clock first started thousands of years ago, at its death, and its L amino acids began their journey toward racemization. Creationism, the story of creation . http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php

http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php  But o the other side, evolution is brand new and has been around only since 150 years. So the burden of proof is on the side of the evolutionists. Their theory is only 150 y old, they have to explain why people should believe in this new strange theory.  Then most peopel who ever lived on the earth since 6000 years have been into creationism, even today the great nimority of people are evolutionists, and the great majority of people are into creationism. So the burden of proof lies on the side of the minority, the evolutionists. Creationism, the story of creation . http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php

http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php  The rate at which racemization occurs is dependent on at least ten different factors:

(1) What have been the surrounding water concentrations?

(2) What amount of acidity and/or alkalinity has been nearby at different times? (3) What has been

the varying temperature of the specimen since death? Creationism, the story of creation .

(4)To what degree has there been contact with clay surfaces in the past? (Clay is highly absorbent.) (5) Could aldehydes—especially when associated with metal ions—have contacted the sample at some past time?

http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php   (6) What buffer compounds have contacted it? What were their concentrations? (7) To what degree in the past has the amino acid specimen been “bound” (isolated from surrounding contamination)? (8) If bound, what was the location of the tested specific amino acid, in relation to the outer membrane or shell of the specimen?

(9) How large was the specimen it was in? Have changes in size occurred in the past? (10) Were bacteria present at some earlier time? Because bacteria can produce one of the amino acids (D-alanine), test results can be thrown off by this one factor. Creationism, the story of creation . http://www.bible-tube.com/hovind-1-age-of-the-earth.php

Creationism, the creation story, story of creation, Creationism, the creation story, story of creation, Creationism, the creation story, story of creation, Creationism, the creation story, story of creation,